Having alive and eventually went down the route

Having to make the decision on what is best for your childparticularly when it concerns one of your other children is a difficultsituation to be in. Whichever opposing side you choose there will always besomeone who gets hurt. Article 3 of the UNCRC states that “the best interestsof children must be the primary concern in making decisions that may affectthem” (UNICEF). The book brings into question whether or not Anna’s bestinterests were ever considered or whether her parents were always thinking onlyof how the situation would benefit Kate.

The parents in the noHaving to make the decision on what is best for your childparticularly when it concerns one of your other children is a difficultsituation to be in. Whichever opposing side you choose there will always besomeone who gets hurt. Article 3 of the UNCRC states that “the best interestsof children must be the primary concern in making decisions that may affectthem” (UNICEF). The book brings into question whether or not Anna’s bestinterests were ever considered or whether her parents were always thinking onlyof how the situation would benefit Kate. The parents in the novel are willingto do anything in order to keep their child alive and eventually went down theroute of creating a designer baby or due to the fact it was for medicalpurposes, a saviour baby. These are children who are created with the specificpurpose of being a complete genetic match to a sibling with life threateningillnesses and where the risk would be too high to use a random donor.

Theprocess uses “Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) to select a compatibleembryo from among a number created through IVF or similar techniques”(lifecharity.org) followed by the chosen embryo being implanted into the uterus.This process isn’t always a guarantee but there are cases where it has helpedto save or prolong a child’s life.

For example, the case of Megan Matthewswhose brother Max was born as a saviour baby in what eventually became thefirst successful treatment of this kind in the UK in 2010. Megan was born with FanconiAnaemia which left her with bone marrow failure and in need of a transplant. Searchesfor a donor came up negative and ultimately the decision was made to create aperfect match for Megan. Since the treatment, Megan no longer needs weeklyblood transfusions and is slowly regaining her life back.

Best services for writing your paper according to Trustpilot

Premium Partner
From $18.00 per page
4,8 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,80
Delivery
4,90
Support
4,70
Price
Recommended Service
From $13.90 per page
4,6 / 5
4,70
Writers Experience
4,70
Delivery
4,60
Support
4,60
Price
From $20.00 per page
4,5 / 5
4,80
Writers Experience
4,50
Delivery
4,40
Support
4,10
Price
* All Partners were chosen among 50+ writing services by our Customer Satisfaction Team

The ethical issuehere is that both Max and Anna were both too young to give proper consent andinstead it was the parent’s decision for them to undergo these procedures whichquestions whether they truly thought of the consequences that would come fromhaving these operations and the long-lasting effects it could have on theirchildren. Was it always in Anna’s best interest to be born and then submittedfor tests and treatments? She never asked to be put in this situation whichmakes it clear that from Anna’s point of view it was never in her bestinterest.vel are willingto do anything in order to keep their child alive and eventually went down theroute of creating a designer baby or due to the fact it was for medicalpurposes, a saviour baby. These are children who are created with the specificpurpose of being a complete genetic match to a sibling with life threateningillnesses and where the risk would be too high to use a random donor. Theprocess uses “Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) to select a compatibleembryo from among a number created through IVF or similar techniques”(lifecharity.

org) followed by the chosen embryo being implanted into the uterus.This process isn’t always a guarantee but there are cases where it has helpedto save or prolong a child’s life. For example, the case of Megan Matthewswhose brother Max was born as a saviour baby in what eventually became thefirst successful treatment of this kind in the UK in 2010.

Megan was born with FanconiAnaemia which left her with bone marrow failure and in need of a transplant. Searchesfor a donor came up negative and ultimately the decision was made to create aperfect match for Megan. Since the treatment, Megan no longer needs weeklyblood transfusions and is slowly regaining her life back. The ethical issuehere is that both Max and Anna were both too young to give proper consent andinstead it was the parent’s decision for them to undergo these procedures whichquestions whether they truly thought of the consequences that would come fromhaving these operations and the long-lasting effects it could have on theirchildren. Was it always in Anna’s best interest to be born and then submittedfor tests and treatments? She never asked to be put in this situation whichmakes it clear that from Anna’s point of view it was never in her bestinterest.