This assignment will describe and explain why a particular social care service user group within the United Kingdom are likely to be disadvantaged, socially excluded and how could this be challenged. The social care service user group that will be looked at in this assignment will be elderly people. Many studies of social exclusion have focused mainly on young people, families and children. Where studies have paid attention to older people, hazard factors such as ethnicity and sex, known to be prescient of social avoidance among other age gatherings, have not been recognised in some quantitative examinations as especially vital segments in clarifying examples of hardship. Hughes and Mtezuka (1992 in Thompson, 2006, p99) explain that ageism is” the social process through which negative images of and attitudes towards older people, based solely on the characterises of old age itself result in discrimination”. “Social exclusion is a complex and multidimensional process. It involves the lack of denial of resources, rights, goods and services, and the inability to participate in the normal relationships and activities, available to the majority of people in a society whether in economic, social, cultural or political arenas. It affects both the quality of life of individuals and the equity and cohesion of society as a whole”. (Levitas et al., 2007 p25). The opposite of social exclusion is social inclusion which means having an upright relationship with friends and family, having a role, feeling useful in society and to others and being treated with respect. Social exclusion is defined by Pierson as the demonstration by which certain individuals are prohibited from sharing in exercises inside the general public of which they ought to be a part of. This incorporates people, families, gathering and entire neighbourhoods. For the most part, this is a result of poverty, different impacts can comprise of segregation and absence off instructive fulfilment. The individuals who are socially barred can’t take an interest in the exercises, administration and openings that the vast majority of the general public an exploit (Pierson, 2010). Social exclusion of older people is a longstanding issue but one which for years has revived a small amount of attention, 7% of older people –approximately 1,2 million – were excluded on there or more dimensions. “A further 13% are excluded on two dimensions. Those on a low income, living alone and suffering depression are between 2 and 5 times more likely to experience multiple exclusion than the older population as a whole. Only 15 of older people have no telephone but, of these, 35% experience multiple exclusion. Almost one in three people over 80 were found to be excluded from basic services compared to in 20 of those aged 50-59, this is similar to those experiencing material exclusion. Exclusion from social relationships is also related to age with 1 in 4 persons aged 80 and over excluded, compared to only 9% of those aged 50-59”. There is an expanding number of individuals living in older age who need support to live their lives because of incapacities and ill health that confine their capacity to do everything for themselves. Older individuals ought not to be seen as ‘solitary group’ as they are heterogeneous populace with changing needs and assets, in spite of the fact that they share encounters related with maturing. The mechanisms that may result in elderly people not accomplishing one or more of the ‘wants’ or ‘life chances’ are grouped under four things which are age-related characteristics, cumulative disadvantage, community characteristics and age-based discrimination. Cumulative disadvantage alludes to the way that birth accomplices may turn out to be unequal after some time. For instance, restricted instructive and work openings at the early focus in the life course may in the long-haul prompt decreased wage in maturity or constrained mindfulness about how to get to the full scope of social and wellbeing administrations. Age-based discrimination refers to the effect of ageism inside financial and social strategies adds to different types of social rejection in maturity. The open negotiation around ageism has tested the connection with age as a type of reliance. It underscores rather different distinctive types of positive engagement that can be kept up all through the last 50% of the life course. Age-related attributes allude to the path in which more established individuals are excessively influenced by certain sort of misfortunes or confinements identifying with pay, wellbeing or lessened socialites. Such changes may occur overall purposes of the life course, yet they are probably going to include all the more conspicuously in later life given retirement-related salary changes the effect of constant crippling conditions and expanded needs among individuals acclimating living alone. Community characteristics feature how more elderly individuals, who may have solid connections to their region, may likewise be helpless against changes related with populace turnover, financial decrease, and rising levels of wrongdoing and uncertainty inside neighbourhoods. (Scie.org.uk, 2017)As people are getting older, the chance that they will become gregariously omitted is more preponderant than the chance that they will move out or become less omitted. Decent housing and access to public transport are the main issues for older people, possibly more so than other measures of withdrawal, because of their impact on social participation. There are a numerous of factors of social exclusion including poverty, lower levels of instructive accomplishment, being without a job, ill health, poor lodging or vagrancy, poor transport access, expanded levels of wrongdoing and constrained social help, all of which can have lifelong impacts. Elderly people will be affected by social exclusion in many ways, for example, those influenced by cumulative underprivileged and persistent poverty, for instance, females without occupational benefits; some older individuals from ethnic minority groups; homeless older people. Those who find it difficult to excursive their civic rights, for example, elderly people not registered to vote and might also find contact with legal and advice services problematic. Those affected by contracting social networks, for instance, elderly people undergoing lonesomeness and intense social isolation, older people without informal carers, single person households. Those relegated to physical and mental ill wellbeing, for instance, the fragile elderly with numerous incessant conditions. Those that have been affected by the operation of ageist convictions and practices, for instance, older people seeking for employment or access to services. Some elderly people may not have access to the internet so that means that they are cut off from modern technologies. (Kneale, 2012)Older people are faced with the risk of losing independence-either financial or otherwise – which is a significant challenge and reinforces the identification of different domains of social exclusion for older people. Many studies of social exclusion have focused on children, adolescents and families. Where studies have focussed on older people, risk factors such as ethnicity and gender, kenned to be predictive of social exclusion midst other age groups have not been distinguished in some quantitative investigations as categorically paramount components in explicating patterns of deprivation.